I’ve been engaged in a lively discussion with other legal marketers in which two topics I love, basketball and leadership, have come together nicely.  You don’t have to be a basketball fan, or even a sports fan, to benefit from the leadership lessons that are often played out, literally, on the courts and fields for all to see.

Many sports teams succeed because of superstars, those supreme talents who lead their teams in numerous statistical categories. Some achieve an even higher, supernatural, level, like NBA stars past and present Michael Jordan and Kobe Bryant, both of whom have earned the league’s top offensive and defensive accolades and are considered, respectively, the greatest player of all time and in the running for 2nd greatest of all time.  Jordan won the league scoring title a record 10 times and earned all-defensive first team honors 9 times. Bryant also earned all-defensive first team honors 9 times, led the league in scoring twice, has the 2nd highest scoring game in league history, and is the youngest player to score 25,000 points. Notably, while Jordan won 6 championships and Bryant has won 5 (so far), neither has been able to win a ring without the contributions of other stars and significant role players. Jordan had Scottie Pippen, voted one of the top 50 players in league history, and Kobe had Shaquille O’Neal, another top 50 player, and Pau Gasol, a former NBA rookie of the year, two-time Olympic silver medalist, and two-time European player of the year. Enough with the basketball history lesson. What’s the larger leadership lesson?

Ken Mink, who at age 73 played for Roane State Community College, and is an inspiration to all aging athletes!

On some teams, transcendent talent is enough. For most of us, we need a team around us in order to succeed. But what happens when the leaders refuse to cede the stage, when the leaders won’t sacrifice their personal statistics for the larger good, saying they want to win but doing everything they can to erect obstacles to success?  I was engaged by a law firm that had plateaued in its growth and wanted my help “shaking the cobwebs” from some of its weaker junior partners so they’d generate more business and “put a little fear” into the associates who were coasting by doing work the partners brought in but who weren’t developing their own books of business.  Sure enough, just as with every law firm, there were some junior partners and associates who needed assistance getting out of the office to network and create some visibility for their practice. But the more we explored avenues for networking, the more I learned that these were “off limits.”  Upon further discovery, I learned that the most successful partners had established a framework that perpetuated an us vs. them mentality. They honestly and earnestly believed the compensation plans were thoughtfully designed to foster collaboration, but had they specifically set out to erect barriers to collaboration they could not have devised a more insidious scheme.

Many leaders want success, but only on their terms. The constraints they place on winning are often the very inhibitors to success. This firm implemented a compensation structure and operating practices that include the following constraints:

  • There is no formula for sharing origination credit. Partners are left to decide how, and if, to allocate credit, with the not unexpected outcome that few partners ever share credit
  • The originating partner receives all origination credit for all future matters in perpetuity, whether that partner is involved in delivering any of the work, up-selling or cross-selling new matters, or has any interaction whatsoever with the client ever again
  • Partners are not required to introduce any lawyers into their relationships, so as not to “muddy” the origination credit issue. After numerous complaints from other lawyers who not surprisingly wanted a share of new matters, the partners responded not by providing guidance for collaboration but by specifically instructing relationship partners to limit client interaction with other lawyers so as to avoid internal disputes
  • No lawyer is allowed to write articles or present at conferences or events, except for partners. This is designed to provide “quality control” and protect the firm’s reputation
  • Partners who are heavily involved in client industry associations, and many are, may prohibit other firm lawyers from participating. So if a partner serves on the board of an association, she or he may forbid more junior lawyers from attending or participating at any level, so as not to create any confusion over origination credit generated from clients in this sector

Switching back to our sports metaphor, when superstars refuse to cede the stage, often in the form of individual stats or playing time or compensation, even though they profess an all-consuming desire to win, they often, and not surprisingly, don’t win. This reluctance to allow others to shine is specifically what’s holding back the team. Any objective observer can review the above policies and identify numerous opportunities to improve collaboration, share credit, and grow client relationships at multiple levels, just as any casual observer can watch a basketball game and recognize a ball hog who refuses to pass to the open man.  When I confronted the senior partners on these issues, their advice to the junior lawyers was to “find your own category to make a name for yourself, and then you too can reap the rewards and benefits of ‘owning’ your own client niche.”  Despite my several attempts at illustrating the benefits of collaboration using simple mathematical formulae, the partners were too protective of their own stats to change.

Note: Plot the expected value of generating 100% credit for a limited number of matters against the expected value of generating partial credit for matters that increase in both volume, size, and repeatability due to collaborative efforts, and the result will invariably demonstrate that collaboration is far more lucrative in both the short-term and long-term.  Said another way: 100% of nothing is still nothing. Often infecting this expected value calculation is both a failure to grasp the difference between optimism and probability, and a tendency to see winning as a zero-sum game.

Eventually all stars fade. In sports, we often see some former superstars sign on to another team as role players in a last ditch attempt to win a ring before their careers are over.  Many others retire, often unwillingly, because they can’t convince their own team, or any new team, to rely on them to be the superstar. I can imagine the partners in the above firm bemoaning “the youth of today who don’t want to work hard” or losing work to competitors when their one-to-one relationship with a key client fails to survive the arrival of a new general counsel. I can also imagine these partners getting pretty nervous as they approach retirement, particularly since their unfunded pension requires the firm to not only survive, but to carve out a significant portion of future earnings to fund the partners’ retirement incomes. Who in their right minds, let alone any on their current staff, will willingly divert a portion of their income to support these stars who are doing little now to grow future rainmakers? A more likely outcome is that those junior lawyers with potential will move on, taking their income potential to greener pastures. Today’s leading partners who won’t cede the stage are tomorrow’s disgruntled retirees, reliving their glory days.

This isn’t a generational issue.  This is a leadership issue.  If your firm has erected barriers to entry for potential future stars to get playing time or to score a few baskets, take a hard look in the mirror. Will you allow them to blossom on your roster, or would you prefer to compete with them in the future when they’re at the top of their game and you’re at the end of yours?

 

Timothy B. Corcoran is the 2014 President of the Legal Marketing Association and an elected Fellow of the College of Law Practice Management. He delivers keynote presentations, conducts workshops, and advises leaders of law firms, in-house legal departments and legal service providers on how to profit in a time of great change.  To inquire about his services, contact him at +1.609.557.7311 or at tim@corcoranconsultinggroup.com.

Print Friendly

The Changing Definition of Value: What Matters Most to In-House Counsel

February 26, 2014

The rules have changed. Law firm partners worldwide reached professional maturity in a much simpler world: One delivered a quality work product and everything else fell into place. Clients were satisfied, lawyers were engaged in thought-provoking work, associates received good training and generous, albeit hard-earned, revenues and profits ensued. This worked. Until it didn’t. As […]

Print Friendly

Read the full article →

Evolve or Perish: Leading your firm in an increasingly competitive market

February 21, 2014

I am pleased to have been invited to deliver the keynote address at the upcoming MPF 2014 Leadership Conference, to be held in Atlanta on May 8.  My remarks will focus less on the challenges posed by the economic and structural disruptions facing the legal profession and more on the compelling opportunities such changes present. […]

Print Friendly

Read the full article →

When and Why Clients Hire Consultants

January 23, 2014

A number of good friends, respected professionals in different fields, have recently joined the ranks of consultants and each has asked in their own way for my advice on how to sell their services.  There are as many opinions about this as there are consultants. So rather than tell them how to sell, I’ll offer […]

Print Friendly

Read the full article →

Recruiting and Staffing Law Firm Pricing and Project Management Roles

January 17, 2014

Please join me and top recruiter Steve Nelson of the McCormick Group as we present our second webinar in a series on identifying and hiring the right talent for your pricing and project management roles: Putting All the Pieces Together. We’ll focus primarily on law firm roles but the discussion will also be relevant to […]

Print Friendly

Read the full article →

OnRamp Fellowship Launches

January 15, 2014

My friend, fellow Fellow of the College of Law Practice Management and occasional collaborator, Caren Ulrich Stacy, has launched a new initiative – the OnRamp Fellowship – with the goal of increasing gender diversity in law firms.  The Fellowship is a re-entry platform that matches women lawyers returning to the profession with law firms for […]

Print Friendly

Read the full article →

A Look Ahead for the Legal Marketing Association in 2014

December 13, 2013

In a few short weeks I take the helm as President of the 3,400+ member strong Legal Marketing Association. I could not be more proud to have been elected to lead LMA, a family in which I have been actively involved for nearly 18 years. Just as each of my esteemed predecessors has faced a […]

Print Friendly

Read the full article →

I Ain’t Gonna Play Sun City

December 6, 2013

I’m sure there are many people, particularly the younger generation, seeing their Tumblr, news feeds and Facebook walls blow up with Nelson Mandela tributes and who, while recognizing the name, still wonder what’s the big deal. We’ve all read in our history books about some of the heinous treatment of one people by another and because […]

Print Friendly

Read the full article →

On Bullying

November 12, 2013

It’s a relatively simple mathematical calculation to quantify the negative impact of bullies in the workplace, yet managers in organizations everywhere allow toxic behavior to persist. This week’s object lesson comes from the NFL Miami Dolphins, where a professional athlete left the team due to persistent harassment and bullying. While the full story is not […]

Print Friendly

Read the full article →

Solving for Profitability

November 10, 2013

At a recent collaborative workshop between two camps — in-house counsel and corporate procurement professionals on one side and and law firm partners, finance and marketing professionals on the other — we had a lively discussion about law firm profits. Most agreed generally with the view that a law firm has a right to profits, […]

Print Friendly

Read the full article →